THE SSPX HAS SIGNED THE DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE ACCEPTING VATICAN COUNCIL II AS A CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION: THEY REJECT THE MULLER, SCHONBORN,KOCH INTERPRETATION WITH AN EXPLICIT LG 8 AND LG 16

Archbishop Augustine Di Noia does the Holy Spirit teach that LG 8 and LG 16 are known to us and not implicit?

The new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is quoted as saying that the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) needs to accept Vatican Council II.

The SSPX has accepted Vatican Council II. They have signed the doctrinal preamble and as promised they should be given canonical status.

It should not be said that the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council. It has been reported and is well known now that the Superior General of the SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay signed the doctrinal preamble which was accepted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

If the SSPX is not being given canonical status it is not because of Vatican Council II.

There were new conditions that the SSPX had to accept it was reported. They are with reference (1) to the Jews and (2) the theology of the liberal version of Vatican Council II.

So it should be clearly said in public that the SSPX is not being accepted into the Church even though they accepted Vatican Council II according to Tradition but because of two other reasons.

1) They are not being accepted because of the demands from the Jewish Left e.g Jews do not have to convert, or that Catholics are not the Chosen People of God and there will be no mission to the Jews.

2) They have to accept theological conditions based on an explicit LG 8 and LG 16. They will have to assume that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are  explicit and visible to us and so contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus..So the result is that now there is a theology of religions and an ecclesiology of communion.

The Vice President of Ecclesia Dei Archbishop Augustine di Noia has told La Stampa that the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit and does not make errors.Explicit LG 16 and LG 8 is an error being thrust upon the SSPX. 

-Lionel Andrades

WILL THE FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST FR.LEONARD FEENEY BE NOW ALSO MADE AGAINST THE SSPX?

The Archbishop of Boston placed penalties on Fr. Leonard Feeney who was faithful to the traditional teaching .Now the CDF is doing the same to the SSPX.

Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits created a new theory of, the visible baptism of desire. The CDF has created a new version of Vatican Council II. It is Vatican Council II with visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) and ‘elements of sanctification’ (LG 8).

Fr. Leonard Feeney refused to accept the false version of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is rejecting the Vatican version of Vatican Council II.

Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated with the excommunication lifted during his lifetime. The Church did not ask him to recant his version of the dogma. He was only asked to recite the Creed. He chose the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

If the SSPX are excommunicated or if there is an ‘ecclesial rupture’ it will be unfortunate since  they affirm Vatican Council II, according to Tradition and with implicit LG 8 and LG 16. There values on other religions and ecumenism are in agreement with Vatican Council II.

When they say they reject Vatican Council II they mean they reject the Ladaria-Koch liberal interpretation of the Council.-Lionel Andrades

THE VATICAN CURIA IS IN A CRISIS WITH THEIR POLITICAL VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II: SSPX SHOULD ASK THEM FOR REFERENCE TEXTS

They Vatican is supported by the Jewish Left media but they have no citations for their ‘ecclesiology of communion’, ‘theology of religions’ and ‘non Catholics do not have to convert for salvation’.

The SSPX –Vatican (Ladaria-Morerod) talks were kept secret. This helped the Vatican which has no citations from the Council for their new theories and obligations.

1.Eclesiology of communion :Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.Since LG 8 and LG 16 are not explicit they do not contradict AG 7. The Curia cannot cite LG 8 or LG 16 as exceptions. They have no citations from Vatican Council II for their ecclesiology of communion.

One cannot just refer to ‘the spirit of Vatican Council II’ which could mean anything to different Catholics. It could also be used to justify sin.

2.Theology of religions:As mentioned above Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water. Since LG 8 and LG 16 are not explicit they do not contradict AG 7.Neither do we know who is saved with the seeds of the Word and imperfect communion with the Church.

AG 7 is in accord with the literal interpetation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there are no known exceptions.

Cardinals Ladaria and Koch cannot cite any exceptions from the Council.

3. Jews do not have to convert in the present time :There is no text in Vatican Council II to support this un-biblical theory. This new political view is contradicted by AG 7, the Bible (John 3:5,Mk.16:16), the dogma on salvation etc.

4.Jews are the Chosen People of God : The Bible says Jews need to convert and there is a New Covenant. Nostra Aetate 4,Vatican Council II says Catholics 'are the new people of God'.-Lionel Andrades

 

THE HOLY SPIRIT GUIDES THE CHURCH TO NOT TEACH ERRORS: THE MAGISTERIUM IS PUBLICLY TEACHING ERRORS.

Error # 1

The popes, cardinals and bishops are quoted in the media saying Jews do not have to convert in the present times.

The Bible says Jews need to convert. This is also a contradiction of Vatican Council II (AG 7).

So there cannot be 'a theology of religions' and an 'ecclesiology of communion' when Vatican Council II (AG 7) says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.This is the teaching of the Holy Sprit before and after Vatican Council II guided by the Holy Spirit.

Error # 2

The rejection of a defined dogma on exclusive salvation is a grave sin. The Church has always taught inspired by the Holy Spirit that it is a mortal sin.

The Magisterium today rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with alleged known cases of persons saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16).They are supposed to be exceptions to the dogma.

How can the Holy Spirit teach that we can know these cases in Heaven, while we are on earth? How can we telephone or meet non Catholics saved with implicit desire, ‘elements of sanctification’ (LG 8) etc? How can theh Holy Spirit teach this non traditional and irrational teaching?

I am a Catholic and I accept Vatican Council II and also like the SSPX (of which I am not a member) reject the Muller-Koch-Ladaria version of Vatican Council II which has an objective error and so cannot be guided by the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades