DIVINE WILL HAS NOT CHANGED AFTER VATICAN COUNCIL II

'The ecclesial service of the Magisterium is rooted in explicit Divine Will ' says Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Vatican

It is not Divine Will that the Magisterium must  change  the teachings of the Catholic Church.According to Vatican Council II (AG 7) all non Catholics needs to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation and this includes Protestants. Yet Pope Benedict and the Vatican Curia have indicated that they do not have to convert into the Church for salvation. They have also indicated that this is the teaching of the Catholic Church. This is not Divine Will. The Holy Spirit cannot have one way for going to Heaven and avoiding Hell before Vatican Council II and another way after Vatican Council II. Objective reality does not change.

The Magisterium after Vatican Council II interprets the Council with no supportive texts.This is a break from tradition. It has the hermeneutic of discontinuity.

This is not 'explicit Divine Wil'l. There is no  New Revelation in the Catholic Church to indicate that Divine Will has changed as the cardinal suggests.

 

The SSPX has to accept these errors in the name of Vatican Council II.

Cardinal Mauro Piacenza says:

One might make reference also to openness toward Christians belonging to other confessions, which has caused the preciousness of unity to re-emerge, in all its beauty, as a necessary attribute of the Church, and as a gift, freely offered by Christ, of being ever welcoming, by means of a continuous purification of those who belong to Him.

According to Vatican Council II (AG 7)  Christians belonging to other confessions need Catholic Faith for salvation.The Vatican does not mention this or seem open to this Conciliar teaching. AG 7 indicates that the explicit Divine Will has not changed.-Lionel Andrades

 

1.

Clergy Congregation Prefect Speaks of the 50th Anniversary of Vatican II By Antonio Gaspari ROME, SEPT. 10, 2012 (Zenit.org) .- http://www.zenit.org/article-35485?l=english

VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS BEEN POLITICISED AND TWO GROUPS ARE REJECTING EACH OTHERS POSITION: VATICAN CURIA AND THE SSPX

At the heart of the differences is the Richard Cushing Error. It determines the hermeneutic of continuity or discontinuity.If there is an ecclesial rupture it will be because the pope does not want to give up the Richard Cushing Error.

The Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX) is faithful to Sacred Tradition inspired by the Holy Spirit. They are rejecting an interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not faithful to Tradition because of the error which emerged from Boston in the 1940's.

There is also political pressure on the Vatican, from forces which are anti-Catholic and who have political power today.They want to prevent a reconciliation and want the Curia to choose heresy and sin.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican (CDF) cannot expect the SSPX, or rational Catholics, to accept that the dead are visible to us and so Lumen Gentium 16 is an exception to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus..

The CDF cannot suggest that outside the Church there is salvation when we do not know any exception in 2012 or the last 100 years.

How can the CDF believe Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is salvation when no text in the Council makes this claim?

If for political reasons the CDF has to accept that the Council says there is salvation outside the Church, then that is a different thing. It's not part of the Deposit of the Faith.

It  has now been a few years that I have been writing on these same points and no one from the Vatican Curia or elsewhere corrects or contradicts me

The present position of the Vatican Curia seems a political one and they are trying to force it onto the SSPX with threats.

Due to the Cushing heresy, the pope, Vatican Curia, cardinals, bishops and priests, proclaim Jesus without the necessity of being a visible member of the Church for salvation. This heresy is widespread in the Church and they expect the SSPX to accept it.-Lionel Andrades

It is the responsibility of the CDF to clarify doctrine and the Faith and so they should answer the two questions for all to know

Archbishop Gerhard Muller and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J, Prefect and Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican are still not answering two questions , (1) which are directly linked to the interpretation of Vatican Council II in accord with Tradition.

If they answered these two questions it would help in the reconciliation with the SSPX.

Even Mons. Nicola Bux and others, in spite of appeals, are not answering the two questions and addressing the problem of the visible-dead.

If the visible dead problem does not exist i.e if we can see the dead on earth; they are saved and are visible to us, then LG 16, Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Vatican Council II would be saying there is salvation outside the Catholic Church.The Council is then a break with Tradition.

The answer to those two questions determines If Vatican Council II has a 'hermeneutic of discontinuity',as the Prefect for the Council for the Clergy,Vatican described it recently.

It is the responsibility of the CDF to clarify doctrine and the Faith and so they should answer the two questions for all to know.-Lionel Andrades

1.

1) Do we personally know the dead saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc ?

2) Since we do not know any of these cases, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?