Monday, June 24, 2013

Card. Christoph Schonborn and Card. Timothy Michael Dolan are members of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation!!

No one has still protested at Cardinal Christoph Schonborns statement that Vatican Council II has to be interpreted according to Tradition but there was also ' a developnent of doctrine' in the Council.He is a member of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation.
 
Vatican Council II does not mention any case of explicit salvation outside the church. Seeds of the word, imperfect communion with the church, elements of sanctification etc are possibilities. We do not know of any such case over the last 100 years. They are not explicit for us.To assume that they are explciit is the Richard Cushing Error.
Since there are no explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus what is the basis for 'a development of doctrine'? On which new revelation in Vatican Council II is it based ?
 Archbishop Gerhard Muller the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican said that those who interpret the Council as a break with Tradition are heretical. He was referring to all, traditionalists and progressives.

Archbishop Christoph Schonborn when questioned by the media agreed with Archbishop Muller but also added that in Vatican Council II there was ' a doctrinal development' ! You can have your cake and eat it too!

For progressives a doctrinal development means accepting 'the theology of religions', the 'ecclesiology of communion' and the 'ecumenism of non return'. This is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Social Reign of Christ the King.It is a break with Vatican Council II (AG 7)

Cardinal Christoph Schonborn has no text in Vatican Council II to support his new theology.Since the Council does not mention anyone in particular saved outside the church i.e without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water. References to invincible ignorance, a good conscience, seeds of the word etc are in-principle cases, accepted hypothetically and known only to God.So the Council does not cite any case which contradicts the traditional teaching on other religions.For Cardinal Schonborn non Catholics could be saved in their religion and they are being saved in their religion in the present times. So they  do not have to convert. Similar would be the case with Christians.So why does he evangelize ?
 banner-en
 
CARDINAL TIMOTHY DOLAN
This is also the doctrinal error of the other member of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation, Cardinal Timothy Dolan.
 
There has been no apology from Fr.Jonathan Morris since he is following the policy set by the Archbishop of New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan.Fr.Jonathan Morris suggested that there are non Catholics in the present times who do not have to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.Michael Voris on Church Militant TV asked him to name any such case or apologize.
Archbishop Timothy Dolan affirms the Catholic Faith on social and moral issues but like the Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans and others  is  assuming that there are known exceptions to the dogma on salvation and to Vatican Council II (AG 7). According to the dogma on salvation and Vatican Council II (AG 7) we evangelize because all non Catholics and non Christians are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church. They need to be visible members of the Church with 'faith and baptism'.
 http://imgick.silive.com/home/silive-media/pgmain/img/advance/photo/2013/06/cardinal-dolan-visits-staten-island-albanian-islamic-cultural-center-b142babfaceed885.jpg
The cardinals new theology and new ecumenism is based on the error of the visible to us  baptism of desire. On this error is based the New Evangelisation too. With this heresy he offers Holy Mass in English and no one protests.No one tells him that there can be no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Cardinal Schonborn and Cardinal Timothy Dolan offer Mass and heretically deny the defined dogma on salvation, Vatican Council II (AG 7) and other magisterial documents which must be firmly believed,like Dominus Iesus 20.Their evangelisation rests on doctrinal errors.
 
It is not part of the Deposit of the Faith to believe that we can see the dead on earth.Vatican Council II no where claims that there are known exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation. So there is no doctrinal basis for 'a development of doctrine' regarding the dogma on salvation  or 'a theology of religions' regarding the Protestants and others.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.annusfidei.va/content/novaevangelizatio/en/segreteria/membriconsultori.html

Mons. Reno Fisichella, President of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation is using the Richard Cushing Error :Jesus without the Church

Mons. Reno Fisichella, President of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelisation is using the Richard Cushing Error and is proclaiming Jesus without the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.So are members and consultents of this Council all over the world.
When he was the Rector of the St.John Lateran University, Rome I had been sending him messages and once contacted his secretary,a young priest, but there was no reply to my queries.No response.
 banner-en
Why must the Gospel be announced in the whole world if salvation is also possible outside the Church for Mons. Reno Fisichella ?
Mons. Fischella and the Office of the New Evangelsation imply that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church. He does not know anyone on earth who will be saved outside being a visible member of the Church.He cannot name anyone on earth who does not need to be a Catholic, to be saved from Hell. Yet his office will not affirm Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation. The text of AG 7 has been included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation.
 
The Council for the New Evangelization interprets Vatican Council II and other Church documents with the Richard Cushing Error ,  mistake of the Archbishop of Boston. The American Archbishop  assumed that the dead now saved and in Heaven and who were in invincible ignorance or had implicit faith, are physically visible to us; are personally known to us , for them to be known exceptions to AG 7 and the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.
This is an irrational interpretation, since we cannot see the dead alive.
If Mons.Fisichella did not use this irrationality it would mean there are no known exceptions to everyone in 2013 needing Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation; to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.
So it is not enough to talk about the love of God and the existence of God as being done by speakers approved by this ne Pontifical Council, but to speak of the necessity of believing in Jesus Christ for salvation, in only the Catholic Church.As Pope Francis said 'One cannot find Jesus outside the Church' citing St.Ignatius of Loyola.
The Office of Evangelization is contradicting St. Ignatius of Loyola, the Church Councils, popes and saints on the issue of outside the church there is no salvation, because they are making the same mistake as the Archbishop of Boston.
 
Reno Fisichella cannot be corrected by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith since they too make the same mistake. Archbishop Gerhard Muller , Prefect of the CDF and Archbishop and Augustine Di Noia ,Vice President, Ecclesia Dei,CDF,Vatican in interviews with the National Catholic Register upheld the Richard Cushing Error. This is also the public error of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J, Secretary, CDF in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission. These collected papers have been published in a book Documenti (ITC) in which the objective error of being able to see the dead, is allowed to influence theology.
All Christans need Catholic Faith to go to Heaven (AG 7) and though there may be some Christians in imperfect communion with the Catholic Church(UR 3), defacto, personally we we do not known any such case for them to be known or unknown exceptions to Ad Gentes7.
All Christians need to convert into 'this one and only Church of God'(UR 3) for salvation, they need to be members of the Catholic Church, 'the new people of God' (NA 4). 
We really could evangelize with two points, as did the saints:-
1) All non Catholics with no exception are on the way to Hell. (Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7).
2.All non Catholics with no exception need to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.( Vatican Council II (AG 7), Catechism of the Catholic Church(846), Dominus Iesus 20 etc).
We speak not only of the love of God but also the fear of God.
However the Office of Evangelisation would object and say this is not true, implying that we know cases saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire who are exceptions to the above two points.This was the original Richard Cushing Error.
The same error as the President of this Pontifical Council, is being made by its consultents and members (1). -Lionel Andrades
00450_30052011
 
(1)
 
 
Suggest an event

SSPX should demand that Pontifical universities and seminaries accept Vatican Council II without the Richard Cushing Error for canonical status or recognition

Father Robert Christian O.P the American who teaches Ecclesiology at the Pontifical University of St.Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum), Rome interprets Vatican Council II with the Richard Cushing Error.
 
There are two ways in which the Council can be interpreted, with or without the Richard Cushing Error.The professors at the Angelicum University choose the one with the irratiional premise of being able to see the dead. This was also the error of the former Rector of the Angelicum university who participated in doctrinal talks with the SSPX.
Why is Prof. Christian  granted canonical status ? Why is the university granted recognition when they will not affirm the Council according to Tradition, and the values of the SSPX on other religions and ecumenism, because of an irrationality? An irrationality known in public.
Why should the SSPX accept Vatican Council II with this irrationality ?
The SSPX should clarify this issue with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Congregation for Catholic Education.-Lionel Andrades

Vatican Council II is traditional: SSPX should ask Ecclesia Dei to accept the Council without the Richard Cushing Error

The Council indicates all non Catholics need faith and baptism (AG 7) for salvation.
 
This is not the Vatican Council II which the cardinals of the Curia accept.They interpret the Council with the Richard Cushing Error and they want the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II also with the error of the Archbishop of Boston. He assumed that the dead now saved and in Heaven and who were in invincible ignorance and or had implicit faith, are physically visible to us; are personally known to us, for them to be known exceptions to AG 7 and the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.
This is an irrational interpretation, since we cannot see the dead alive and walking, and so the Society of St.pius X (SSPX) would correctly reject it.They could ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Ecclesia Dei to do the same.
 
It is a break with Tradition which does not state anywhere that we can see the dead saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), elements of sanctification (LG 8), seeds of the Word (AG 11), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), 'good and holy' things in other religions (NA 2) etc.
 
This is the public error of Archbishop Gerhard Muller , Prefect of the CDF and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia ,Vice President, Ecclesia Dei,CDF,Vatican in interviews with the National Catholic Register. This is also the public error of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J, Secretary, CDF in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission. These collected papers have been published in a book Documenti (ITC) in which the objective error of being able to see the dead, is allowed to influence theology.
The SSPX could inform the CDF/Ecclesia Dei that on the issue of other religions and ecumenism, they accept a Vatican Council II without the Richard Cushing Error. Ask the CDF if they are willing to do the same.
-Lionel Andrades